rexx:Array~of(…).
(An Array term will always return an instance of the Rexx-defined
Array class, even if a user-defined class named
Array exists.)
week = "mon", "tue", "wed", "thu", "fri", "sat", "sun"
say week~items "days" -- 7 days
say ("here", "we", "go")~makeString(, " ") -- here we go
iso639 = .Directory~of(("de", "Deutsch"), ("en", "English"), ("fr", "français"))
do list over .environment, .local
say list~items -- 65
end -- 10
say 0~sendWith("MAX", (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13)) -- 13
sparse = ,,,0
say "size" sparse~size"," sparse~items "items" -- size 4, 1 items
.Array~of(…)
would have returned:
say (1, , 3, ,)~size .Array~of(1, , 3, ,)~size -- 5 3
say (,)~size .Array~of(,)~size -- 2 0
call func "uno", 2, "tre" -- no Array term: three parms
call func ("uno", 2, "tre") -- Array term: one Array as parm
say (,)~items -- 0
say (,)~size -- 2